GEO
September 10, 2025
Search engines are adopting generative AI to deliver responses that resemble human explanations rather than static outputs. This change places GEO at the center of new optimization efforts. It also raises questions about how GEO fits with existing SEO practices.
The article outlines where these models differ and where they overlap. In doing so, it builds a path toward practical steps that marketers can take to prepare for a transformed search environment.
Search engines are moving beyond their role as indexers of pages. Generative AI allows them to assemble information. It also helps them interpret intent and provide responses that resemble human explanation.
The way people search has grown more conversational. Engines are trained to handle longer and more natural phrasing. Users now expect direct responses to full questions. Short keyword strings no longer meet their needs. Here are some of the patterns shaping this behavior.
The presentation of results has been reshaped. AI-generated overviews alter how people consume information by:
The strategic choices behind GEO and SEO highlight where they pull apart. Their goals differ. Their style of writing differs. Their signals of authority and their methods of measurement differ as well. These contrasts define how each approach should be used.
The two approaches diverge in scope and execution:
Marketers do not need to choose one path over the other. A blended strategy takes advantage of the reach of SEO. At the same time, it ensures visibility in AI-driven overviews. The steps below suggest how to integrate both approaches.
Optimization has split into two branches. The first is AI SEO, which adapts traditional methods for machine learning. The second is GEO, which tailors content for generative search results. Understanding how each works provides a foundation for smarter strategy.
GEO focuses on making content usable inside AI-generated summaries. It does this by:
Despite their differences, the two approaches share common ground. Technical soundness matters. Authority matters. Readable formatting matters as well. This section looks at the practices that reinforce visibility in both models.
The choice between AI SEO and GEO depends on goals and context. A practical breakdown:
GEO optimization is about anticipating how generative engines interpret queries. It is also about selecting content that meets those expectations. The process begins with research. It continues through on-page refinement.
Generative engines favor queries that sound conversational. To identify useful patterns:
AI overviews highlight content that is clear and immediately useful. Effective writing includes:
On-page refinements help content align with generative search systems. Adjustments include:
SEO will still matter for link-based rankings, but GEO will become critical for visibility in AI-driven overviews. Marketers will need to optimize for both.
Yes. Being cited in an AI overview builds trust and recognition, even if users don’t immediately visit the site.
AI-generated summaries can misrepresent content or reduce referral traffic, so accuracy and strong branding inside the content are essential.
Fields with complex questions, like healthcare, travel, education, and finance, tend to gain more exposure in AI-driven search because users want fast, reliable answers.
Success is tracked through impressions in AI-driven search, brand mentions inside summaries, and engagement metrics when users click through from overviews.